April 27, 2011

Eschatology is Everything

I'm reading a lot on the Apostle Paul these days. And among the many things I'm learning, one stands out from the others: for Paul, eschatology is everything. His view of "last things" soaks his theological thinking. You cannot escape it. It's pervasive. I've read this before, of course. But it is now taking root in my own thinking in a new and exciting way.

Consider, for Paul that justification is the present faith-anticipation of the eschatological verdict. Sanctification is the Spirit-life of the future come into the present. Salvation itself is a matter of being united with Christ in his death and resurrection, which is the first fruits of the final resurrection of the people of God. The presence of the Spirit in the Church marks it out as an eschatological community. And the Mosaic Law, though it was a good thing, is now obsolete because it was intended for an age that has now ended with the coming of the Christ and the Spirit. More could be said, but you get the picture.

But why is Paul's theology so pervasively eschatological? I am persuaded that it is because of his all-consuming focus on Christ. The first coming of Christ was an eschatological event which inaugurated the eschatological kingdom of God. His death on the cross is the decisive end of the old age; his resurrection the decisive beginning of the new. As already observed, his resurrection is also the initial phase of the general resurrection, his new life the beginning of the new creation that will find its ultimate consummation upon his return. Let's not forget that Paul's eschatology is not fully realized; to suggest as much would be a grave misunderstanding of his thought. But Paul did believe himself to be living at the end of the old age and the beginning of the new. And the crucial difference was the presence of the Messiah, Jesus Christ the Lord. And because of that, for Paul, eschatology is everything.

1 comment:

ἐκκλησία said...

You ask a good question.

Given my comments in your post above, I'd offer the following answer:

Paul's theology seems so pervasively eschatological, simply because our own theology cannot distinguish 'historical' from 'eschatological'.

So in theology, when we sense the prophetic work of the kingdom, we presuppose that it MUST be eschatological rather than historical simply because we cannot understand its prophetic work in history.

However, if the kingdom Christ built has been given prophetic work, we must see this work the same way prophecy does - atemporally, or is that pan-temporally?!

Although SOME prophecy is clearly eschatological (which means it deals with end times), just as some prophecy is past, prophecy itself is actually pan-historical (which is to say it spans across all of time, all of history, including current events).

God does not simply reserve the right to order the past and the future, but he orders the end from the beginning and everything in between.

Paul's theology is pervasively historical, pervasively prophetic, indeed eschatological (thought not entirely) and indeed Christ-centric.